Jurisprudential analysis on substitute compensation in the department of caldas: contrast between legal security and the right to social security

Authors

  • Vanessa Ocampo Orozco Facultad de Derecho, Pereira, Colombia. Author
  • Jaime Andrés Pérez Cotrin Facultad de Derecho, Pereira, Colombia. Author
  • Nezar Restrepo Zuluaga Facultad de Derecho, Pereira, Colombia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024234

Keywords:

Pension Favourability, Pension Replacement Compensation, Pension Regime, Transition

Abstract

The substitute indemnity for the old-age pension stands as an economic benefit for the worker who failed to comply with the number of weeks required by the Law for the recognition of the old-age pension, having to profess Law 100 of 1993, erected a General Pension System divided into a medium premium regime with a defined benefit administered by the Colombian Pension Administrator – COLPENSIONES; and, an individual savings scheme with solidarity, where a group of private fund insurers proliferate. Now, the aforementioned norm established in article 151, that the General Pension System would enter into force for public servants at the departmental, municipal and district level as of June 30, 1995 (Law 100, 1993), therefore, in advance As of that date, this charge was at the head of the social security funds of the territorial entities, finding that some of them were not affiliated to said funds or despite being, the benefit was denied when it was specified that the introduction of this benefit did not applied to such employees. Thus, it is important from the pronouncements of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of Justice, the contrast that is presented in the subject in question will be established, since it has been indicated by the aforementioned corporations that rights such as social security by the government of Caldas, by not recognizing the substitute compensation for employees terminated prior to June 30, 1995.

References

1. Castellanos Colorado, Pedro Julián (2020). El fenómeno de la indemnización sustitutiva de pensión, un análisis a la afectación a los derechos fundamentales en Boyacá. Universidad Santo Tomás. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/11634/23334

2. Congreso de Colombia, Ley 33, 1985.

3. Congreso de la República de Colombia, Ley 100, 1993.

4. Consejo de Estado Sección Segunda, Sentencia 25000232500020110045201 (34332014), 2019.

5. Consejo de Estado, (2020). Sección Segunda. Sentencia del 14 de agosto de 2020. Radicación número: 13001-23-33-000-2014-00370-01(0504-17)

6. Consejo de Estado, (2021). Sección Segunda. Sentencia del 30 de septiembre de 2021. Radicación número: 47001-23-33-000-2014-00227-01(3864-18)

7. Consejo de Estado, (2021). Sección Segunda, Sentencia del 1 de julio de 2021. Radicación número: 25000-23-42-000-2015-02149-01(2544-17).

8. Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-681, 2013.

9. Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-164, 2017.

10.Moreno, Milton José (2019). Devolución de aportes, opción para la vejez tras una pensión fallida. DOI: https://revista.fasecolda.com/index.php/revfasecolda/article/download/512/495/940

11.Quiroz-Noguera, G. de J. (2019). La indemnización sustitutiva y la devolución de saldos de la pensión de vejez del régimen general de pensiones frente al régimen de la fuerza pública. Trabajo de Grado. Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Derecho. Bogotá, Colombia.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-07

How to Cite

1.
Ocampo Orozco V, Pérez Cotrin JA, Restrepo Zuluaga N. Jurisprudential analysis on substitute compensation in the department of caldas: contrast between legal security and the right to social security. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 7 [cited 2024 Oct. 12];2:234. Available from: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/index.php/piii/article/view/207