Contributions of bibliometrics to the study of interdiscipline. A methodology for the analysis of the intersection between the fields of neurosciences and computational sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024272Keywords:
Interdiscipline, Bibliometrics, Neurosciences, Computer ScienceAbstract
Despite the growing importance of interdisciplinary studies for the development of science, quantitative works on the subject are not abundant. Bibliometrics offers tools to analyze interdisciplinarity through a complementary approach to qualitative work. While there is a body of precedents in bibliometrics (1,2,3,4,5,6), methodological proposals for the construction of databases of the intersection of two disciplines are scarce.(7) Thus, a proposal is made to identify an interdisciplinary field with a set of scholarly articles.
The objective of this work is to develop a methodology for defining the intersection between the fields of neuroscience and computational science. This area of study is not directly traceable from categorizations in databases. For this reason, three strategies are built to delimit an interdisciplinary corpus and compare the potential and limitations of each of them. The three strategies are focused, on the one hand, on keywords and, on the other hand, on citation and reference patterns using the Web Of Science database.
It is found that it is possible to operationalize the interdiscipline with two types of approaches: 1. A semantic approach based on the use of keywords. A relational approach focusing on cross-references and citations between articles from the two disciplines. As a result, a basis for the study of the intersection between the fields of neurosciences and computational sciences from a bibliometric perspective is obtained, and a methodological proposal for the quantitative study of interdiscipline in other areas of knowledge is mad
References
Heimeriks G, Hörlesberger M. Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. 2003.
Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;58(9):1303-19.
Larivière V, Gingras Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;61(1):126-31.
Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics. 2010;82(2):263-87.
Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW, Keyton J, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. J Informetr. 2011;5(1):14-26.
Leydesdorff L, Wagner CS, Bornmann L. Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield. Scientometrics. 2018;114(2):567-92.
Morillo F, Bordons M, Gómez I. An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Malena Méndez Isla, Agustin Mauro, Diego Kozlowski (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
