A geopolitical look at Science and Technology: global tensions and imaginaries. The case of bioinputs in argentina

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024294

Keywords:

Bioinputs, geopolitics, socio-technical imaginaries

Abstract

Bioinputs constitute a new technological promise that opens the possibility of reconciling opposing interests within the agricultural field, which must be thought in the global context where multiple factors such as political, cultural, social, economic and legal influence. The following work had the objective of establishing a geopolitical view on the situation of bioinputs in Argentina and the link between world order, foreign policy and technological development.
This work was framed within science and technology studies from a critical communication theory perspective. We start from the following research question: Would technological autonomy in agricultural bioinputs allow the consolidation of national sovereignty? Is the development of bioinputs in the country a promise for the development of the country to move from being a peripheral country to a central country? 
It is intended to look at how the case of technological innovations of bioinputs play a central role in terms of scientific and technological development from a geopolitical point of view, having as an axis to articulate the concept of socio-technical imaginary. Based on a case study: bioinputs in Argentina, it was intended to analyze the discursive genres taking into account the discourse analysis proposed by Van Dijk (1996), analyzing the structures and functions of the text in its social, political and cultural context from the viewpoint of critical thinking

References

(1) Van Dijk, Teun. La noticia como discurso, comprensión, estructura y producción de la información, Barcelona, Paidós.Verón, Eliseo (1987) Construir el acontecimiento. Gedisa, Barcelona. (1996)

(2) Wodak, Ruth El enfoque histórico del discurso. En Wodak, Ruth y Meyer, Michael. Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso, Gedisa: Barcelona (2003).

(3) Blinder, D. Orden Mundial y tecnología. Análisis institucional desde la perspectiva geopolítica en la semiperiferia: la tecnología espacial y de misiles en Argentina y Brasil. Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder, 8(2), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.5209/GEOP.53257 (2017). P. 179, 187.

(4) Wallerstein, I. El moderno sistema mundial. Tomo I. México: Siglo XXI. [págs. 489-502]. (2005).

(5) Starobinsky, G., Monzón, J., Di Marzo Broggi, E. y Braude, E. Bioinsumos para la agricultura que demandan esfuerzos de investigación y desarrollo. Capacidades existentes y estrategia de política pública para impulsar su desarrollo en Argentina. Documentos de Trabajo del CCE N° 17. Consejo para el Cambio Estructural - Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo de la Nación. (2021). P. 4, 23, 10.

(6) Hurtado, D. “La ciencia argentina. Un proyecto inconcluso”, Buenos Aires: Edhasa. (2010).

(7) Jasanoff, S. y Kim, S.-H. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47, 119-46. (2009).

(8) Willer, H., Trávníček, J., Meier, C. y Schlatter, B. (eds.). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2021. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM-Organics International. (2021).

(9) Agnew, John Mastering Space; Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. Nueva York: Routledge. (1995). P. 15.

(10) Agnew, John Globalization and Sovereignty. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield (capítulo II) (2010).

(11) Goulet, F. y Hubert, M. Making a place of alternative technologies. The case of agricultural bio-inputs in Argentina. Review of policy research. (2020). P. 2.

(12) Herth, A. Le biocontrôle et la protection des cultures. 15 recommandations pour soutenir les technologies vertes. Disponible en: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/le-bio-controle-pour-la-protection-des-cultures-15-recommandations-pour-soutenir-les-technologies (consultado el 1/5/2020). (2011).

(13) Adler, E. State institutions, ideology and autonomous technological development: computers and nuclear energy in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 23 (2). pp. 59-90. ISSN 1542-4278. (1988).

(14) Ministerio de Agricultura, ganadería y pesca de Argentina. Plan de acción para el sector de los bioinsumos de uso agropecuario. (2019). P. 5.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

1.
Macedo MG. A geopolitical look at Science and Technology: global tensions and imaginaries. The case of bioinputs in argentina. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations [Internet]. 2024 May 8 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];2:294. Available from: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/index.php/piii/article/view/263