Incidence of virtual education in front of covid-19 in the tilipulo neighborhood during the school year 2020- 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2025410Keywords:
COVID-19, virtual education, digital divide, school dropout, rural connectivityAbstract
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, had a profound impact on various aspects of society, including education. In this context, virtual education acquired greater relevance as a solution for the continuity of learning at all educational levels. This study focused on the Tilipulo neighborhood in Latacunga to analyze the advantages, limitations and realities of virtual education in the face of the pandemic.
Development
The research identified that, although virtual education allowed students to continue their education, this modality presented multiple challenges, especially in rural areas. In Tilipulo, limited internet connectivity, scarcity of technological devices and lack of knowledge in the use of digital platforms hindered meaningful learning. These conditions exacerbated the education gap and led to high dropout rates. Despite the limitations, it was noted that virtual education helped to protect the health of students and their families, preventing the spread of the virus.
Conclusions
Virtual education, although vital in the health crisis, failed to match the standards of face-to-face education due to structural and technological limitations. It was concluded that it is necessary to implement strategies to improve digital infrastructure, train teachers and students, and adapt teaching methods to local conditions. These efforts are essential to ensure inclusive and equitable education, especially in vulnerable communities such as Tilipulo
References
1. Arias F. *El proyecto de investigación introducción a la metodología científica*. Caracas: Episteme C.A.; 2006.
2. Arias J, Villasís M, María M. El protocolo de investigación III: la población de estudio. *Rev Alerg Méx*. 2016;63(2):201-206.
3. Bernal. *Metodología de la investigación*. Colombia: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN; 2010.
4. Delgado Ortiz MI, Hernández Mujica JL. Los virus, ¿son organismos vivos? Discusión en la formación de profesores de Biología. *VARONA, Revista Científico-Metodológica*. 2015;(61):1-7.
5. Espinoza E. El tutor en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. *Universidad y Sociedad*. 2018;10(1):201-210.
6. García D. La educación virtual: una realidad a la fuerza. *ITSitio*. 2020 May 11. Disponible en: https://www.itsitio.com/ar/la-educacion-virtual-una-realidad-la-fuerza/
7. Göller RA. Educación virtual o virtualidad en la educación. *Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana*. 2012;14(19):137-150.
8. Kaffure LH. El concepto de pandemia: debate e implicaciones a propósito de la pandemia de influenza de 2009. *Rev Gerenc Polit Salud*. 2010;9(19):53-68.
9. Malley. ¿Sabes qué es Mobile Learning? Tendencia en los próximos años. *eLearning Masters*. 2017. Disponible en: http://elearningmasters.galileo.edu/2017/05/03/sabes-que-es-el-mobile-learning/
10. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Información básica sobre la COVID-19. *WHO*. 2020 Nov 10. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19
11. Paitán H, Valdivia M, Palacios J, Romero H. *Metodología de la investigación*. Bogotá: Ediciones de la U; 2018.
12. Romero FG. La enseñanza virtual en el aprendizaje de los estudiantes del Instituto Superior Tecnológico Pedro Vilcapaza - Perú. *Comuni@cción*. 2013;5(1):14-21.
13. Sampieri RH. *Metodología de la investigación*. México D.F.: McGRAW-HILL; 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nasheli Estefanía Moreno Muso (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
