Tempvision 1000: A Portable Temperature Measurement and Monitoring System for Boiler Combustion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2025522Keywords:
Boiler combustion, tempvision, PTMSAbstract
This research investigates the operational and maintenance strategies aimed at improving boiler combustion efficiency at PT Indonesia Power UJP Banten 1 Suralaya, with an emphasis on the integration of the Portable Temperature Measurement System (PTMS) and the Distributed Control System (DCS). The objectives encompass comprehending the workflow of power plant systems, the role of PTMS in monitoring boiler combustion temperatures, maintenance facilitated by PTMS, and tackling challenges such as slagging and temperature deviations. Data were collected through direct observation of PTMS operations and analyzed using Rodin III PTMS software, employing a quantitative methodology. Parameters including Distributed Control System (DCS) data, specific fuel consumption (SFC), coal flow, air flow, steam flow and pressure, superheater (SH) and reheater (RH) temperatures, and air ratio served as benchmarks. Measurements from the boiler layers (TOP, LT8, SOFA, CCOFA, G, EF, CD, and AB) offered insights into the temperature distribution. The findings demonstrate that the integration of PTMS and DCS improves monitoring accuracy, facilitating precise adjustments to enhance combustion efficiency. Adjustments to the secondary air damper minimized temperature variations, addressed slagging problems, and reinstated sighthole functionality, as observed at CCOFA5, facilitating thorough data collection. Regular maintenance of components such as pulverizers and analysis of combustion byproducts ensured uniform fuel distribution and operational reliability. This integrated approach enhances efficiency, decreases emissions, and mitigates environmental impact. This study highlights the significance of advanced monitoring tools and proactive maintenance for sustainable and reliable power generation, providing a framework for analogous systems aiming for improved performance and energy sustainability.
References
1. Parihar R, sawhney S, Vaish A, Verma S. Image Processing Using K Means Clustering and Euclidean Distance Method. International Journal of Technical Research & Science. 2022;VII(Iii):1–15.
2. Liu Z, Zhou Q, Tian Z, He B jie, Jin G. A comprehensive analysis on definitions, development, and policies of nearly zero energy buildings in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019 Oct 1;114:109314.
3. Islam MT, Huda N, Abdullah AB, Saidur R. A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018 Aug 1;91:987–1018.
4. Payel SB, Ahmed SMF, Taseen N, Siraj MT, Shahadat MR Bin. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACHIEVING OPERATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY OF BOILERS IN THE CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY 4.0. International Journal of Industrial Management [Internet]. 2023 Sep 21 [cited 2025 Jan 4];17(3):138–51. Available from: https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijim/article/view/9062
5. Elwardany M. Enhancing steam boiler efficiency through comprehensive energy and exergy analysis: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024 Apr 1;184:1222–50.
6. Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Hosenuzzaman M, Saidur R, Mahbubul IM, Rashid MM. Energy savings in the combustion based process heating in industrial sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012 Sep 1;16(7):4527–36.
7. Parvez Y, Hasan MM. Exergy analysis and performance optimization of bagasse fired boiler. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering [Internet]. 2019 Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jan 4];691(1):012089. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/691/1/012089
8. Kumar L, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA. Global advancement of solar thermal energy technologies for industrial process heat and its future prospects: A review. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019 Sep 1;195:885–908.
9. Wang F. Wearable Personal Thermal Management Systems (PTMS). 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 4];245–63. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-0718-2_12
10. Wang P, Su S, Zheng F, Bo L. Matching Modeling and Parameter Influence Analysis of PTMS and Turbofan Engine. 2023 14th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, ICMAE 2023. 2023;151–6.
11. Zhuang L, Xu G, Dong B, Liu Q, Huang C, Wen J. Study on performance and mechanisms of a novel integrated model with Power & Thermal Management system and turbofan engine. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2023 Jan 25;219:119481.
12. Onggowarsito C, Mao S, Zhang XS, Feng A, Xu H, Fu Q. Updated perspective on solar steam generation application. Energy & Environmental Science [Internet]. 2024 Mar 19 [cited 2025 Jan 4];17(6):2088–99. Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/ee/d3ee04073a
13. Ghasemi H, Ni G, Marconnet AM, Loomis J, Yerci S, Miljkovic N, et al. Solar steam generation by heat localization. Nature Communications 2014 5:1 [Internet]. 2014 Jul 21 [cited 2025 Jan 4];5(1):1–7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5449
14. Li Y, Wang R, Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang K, Shou W, et al. Scalable Fabric-Based Solar Steam Generator. Advanced Functional Materials [Internet]. 2024 May 1 [cited 2025 Jan 4];34(22):2312613. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adfm.202312613
15. Jiang T, Yu Y, Jahanger A, Balsalobre-Lorente D. Structural emissions reduction of China’s power and heating industry under the goal of “double carbon”: A perspective from input-output analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022 May 1;31:346–56.
16. Lyubov VK, Malygin P V., Popov AN, Popova EI. Determining heat loss into the environment based on comprehensive investigation of boiler performance characteristics. Thermal Engineering (English translation of Teploenergetika) [Internet]. 2015 Jul 14 [cited 2025 Jan 4];62(8):572–6. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S004060151506004X
17. Sim JS, Ha JS. Experimental study of heat transfer characteristics for a refrigerator by using reverse heat loss method. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2011 May 1;38(5):572–6.
18. Meksoub A, Elkihel A, Gziri H, Berrehili A. Heat loss in industry: Boiler performance analysis. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 4];681:647–57. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-6259-4_67
19. Sahu SG, Chakraborty N, Sarkar P. Coal–biomass co-combustion: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014 Nov 1;39:575–86.
20. Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2004 Jan 1;30(2):219–30.
21. Trivedi K, Sharma A, Kanabar BK, Arunachalam KD, Gautam S. Comparative Analysis of Coal and Biomass for Sustainable Energy Production: Elemental Composition, Combustion Behavior and Co-Firing Potential. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution [Internet]. 2024 Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jan 4];235(11):1–12. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07509-3
22. Chindaprasirt P, Rattanasak U. Utilization of blended fluidized bed combustion (FBC) ash and pulverized coal combustion (PCC) fly ash in geopolymer. Waste Management. 2010 Apr 1;30(4):667–72.
23. Zahedi M, Jafari K, Rajabipour F. Properties and durability of concrete containing fluidized bed combustion (FBC) fly ash. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Oct 20;258:119663.
24. Anthony EJ, Jia L, Caris M, Preto F, Burwell S. An examination of the exothermic nature of fluidized bed combustion (FBC) residues. Waste Management. 1999 Jul 1;19(4):293–305.
25. Koornneef J, Junginger M, Faaij A. Development of fluidized bed combustion—An overview of trends, performance and cost. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2007 Feb 1;33(1):19–55.
26. Khodaei H, Al-Abdeli YM, Guzzomi F, Yeoh GH. An overview of processes and considerations in the modelling of fixed-bed biomass combustion. Energy. 2015 Aug 1;88:946–72.
27. Chen Z, Yuan Z, Zhang B, Qiao Y, Li J, Zeng L, et al. Effect of secondary air mass flow rate ratio on the slagging characteristics of the pre-combustion chamber in industrial pulverized coal-fired boiler. Energy. 2022 Jul 15;251:123860.
28. Parida N, Tarafder S, Das SK, Kumar P, Das G, Ranganath VR, et al. Failure analysis of coal pulverizer mill shaft. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2003 Dec 1;10(6):733–44.
29. Takeuchi H, Nakamura H, Iwasaki T, Watano S. Numerical modeling of fluid and particle behaviors in impact pulverizer. Powder Technology. 2012 Feb 1;217:148–56.
30. Lin L, Khang SJ, Keener TC. Coal desulfurization by mild pyrolysis in a dual-auger coal feeder. Fuel Processing Technology. 1997 Nov 1;53(1–2):15–29.
31. Massoudi Farid M, Jeong HJ, Kim KH, Lee J, Kim D, Hwang J. Numerical investigation of particle transport hydrodynamics and coal combustion in an industrial-scale circulating fluidized bed combustor: Effects of coal feeder positions and coal feeding rates. Fuel. 2017 Mar 15;192:187–200.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
